Running on a Gateway PC WinXP Pro S/P 3 Pentium 4 3.8 GHz, 3.25 GB of RAM machine and the latest (as of a week or two ago) version of DiffMerge (3.3.0 (18513)) - that was in fact one of the first things I checked. "\\s21shares\programmers\fiservftp\cbscompare\sourcegear\diffmerge\diffmerge -d=\\s21shares\programmers\fiservftp\cbscompare\diff-ftt90001i.txt -u \\s21shares\programmers\fiservftp\cbscompare\production\ftt90001i \\s21shares\programmers\fiservftp\cbscompare\release\ftt90001i " I'm also using the batch command line compare for the check: Also looked through the past couple of years of posts and didn't see anything about this. Does diffmerge have a limitation on number of records it will try to compare? Note that another file, which is larger in total size, but has fewer lines shows no differences in both diffmerge and UltraEdit, so I don't think it has anyuthing to do with file size per se, just number of records. ![]() One of the files I try comparing contains 575,000 lines (it is my customer statement print file, and I would be unable to share it with you because of the confidental information contained in it) and diffmerge reports no differences between the live and test runs, however, I saw that the file sizes were different and used the file compare feature of UltraEdit and it showed several differences. ![]() ![]() To verify testing results, I will take spool files created by the application I'm testing and compare the live production run against the test run.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |